Showing posts with label Science-Fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Science-Fiction. Show all posts

Friday, 16 February 2018

'Alien', 'Blade Runner' & 'Inception': Video Essays


I discovered these sci-fi video essays at Film Studies For Free. They are made for educational and critical purposes, using fair use/fair dealing procedures, by the Irish filmmaker, broadcaster, and lecturer Steven Benedict.

They are well edited, wide-ranging, insightful, and a great for source for discussion of the key concepts and themes you will encounter during the course. Please take time to view each one to enhance your knowledge and understanding of the subject.

Analysis of Alien from Steven Benedict on Vimeo.

Analysis of Blade Runner from Steven Benedict on Vimeo.

Analysis of Inception from Steven Benedict on Vimeo.

Wednesday, 14 February 2018

Genre: Science-Fiction (Documentary edit)


Science fiction film is a film genre that uses science fictionspeculativescience-based depictions of phenomena that are not necessarily accepted by mainstream science, such as extraterrestrial life formsalien worldsextrasensory perception, and time travel, often along with futuristic elements such as spacecraftrobotscyborgsinterstellar space travel or other technologies. Science fiction films have often been used to focus on political or social issues, and to explore philosophical issues like the human condition. In many cases, tropes derived from written science fiction may be used by filmmakers ignorant of or at best indifferent to the standards of scientific plausibility and plot logic to which written science fiction is traditionally held.
The genre has existed since the early years of silent cinema, when Georges Melies' A Trip to the Moon (1902) amazed audiences with its trick photography effects. The next major example in the genre was the 1927 film Metropolis. From the 1930s to the 1950s, the genre consisted mainly of low-budget B-movies. After Stanley Kubrick's 1968 landmark 2001: A Space Odyssey, the science fiction film genre was taken more seriously. In the late 1970s, big-budget science fiction films filled with special effects became popular with audiences after the success of Star Wars and paved the way for the blockbuster hits of subsequent decades.
Defining precisely which films belong to the science fiction genre is often difficult, as there is no universally accepted definition of the genre, or in fact its underlying genre in literature. According to one definition:
Science fiction film is a film genre which emphasizes actual, extrapolative, or speculative science and the empirical method, interacting in a social context with the lesser emphasized, but still present, transcendentalism of magic and religion, in an attempt to reconcile man with the unknown (Sobchack 63).
This definition assumes that a continuum exists between (real-world) empiricism and (supernaturaltranscendentalism, with science fiction film on the side of empiricism, andhorror film and fantasy film on the side of transcendentalism. However, there are numerous well-known examples of science fiction horror films, epitomized by such pictures as Frankenstein and Alien.
The visual style of science fiction film can be characterized by a clash between alien and familiar images. This clash is implemented when alien images become familiar, as in A Clockwork Orange, when the repetitions of the Korova Milkbar make the alien decor seem more familiar. As well, familiar images become alien, as in the films Repo Man and Liquid Sky.  For example, in Dr. Strangelove, the distortion of the humans make the familiar images seem more alien.  Finally, alien and familiar images are juxtaposed, as inThe Deadly Mantis, when a giant praying mantis is shown climbing the Washington Monument.
Cultural theorist Scott Bukatman has proposed that science fiction film allows contemporary culture to witness an expression of the sublime, be it through exaggerated scale, apocalypse or transcendence.

Tuesday, 13 February 2018

Introduction to Science Fiction


Science Fiction Films are usually scientific, visionary, comic-strip-like, and imaginative, and usually visualized through fanciful, imaginative settings, expert film production design, advanced technology gadgets (i.e., robots and spaceships), scientific developments, or by fantastic special effects. Sci-fi films are complete with heroes, distant planets, impossible quests, improbable settings, fantastic places, great dark and shadowy villains, futuristic technology and gizmos, and unknown and inexplicable forces. Many other SF films feature time travels or fantastic journeys, and are set either on Earth, into outer space, or (most often) into the future time. Quite a few examples of science-fiction cinema owe their origins to writers Jules Verne and H.G. Wells.

They often portray the dangerous and sinister nature of knowledge ('there are some things Man is not meant to know') (i.e., the classic Frankenstein (1931), The Island of Lost Souls (1933), and David Cronenberg's The Fly (1986) - an updating of the 1958 version directed by Kurt Neumann and starring Vincent Price), and vital issues about the nature of mankind and our place in the whole scheme of things, including the threatening, existential loss of personal individuality (i.e.,Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956), and The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957)). Plots of space-related conspiracies (Capricorn One (1977)), supercomputers threatening impregnation (Demon Seed (1977)), the results of germ-warfare (The Omega Man (1971)) and laboratory-bred viruses or plagues (28 Days Later (2002)), black-hole exploration (Event Horizon (1997)), and futuristic genetic engineering and cloning (Gattaca (1997) and Michael Bay's The Island (2005)) show the tremendous range that science-fiction can delve into.

Strange and extraordinary microscopic organisms or giant, mutant monsters ('things or creatures from space') may be unleashed, either created by misguided mad scientists or by nuclear havoc (i.e., The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms (1953)). Sci-fi tales have a prophetic nature (they often attempt to figure out or depict the future) and are often set in a speculative future time. They may provide a grim outlook, portraying a dystopic view of the world that appears grim, decayed and un-nerving (i.e., Metropolis (1927) with its underground slave population and view of the effects of industrialization, the portrayal of 'Big Brother' society in1984 (1956 and 1984), nuclear annihilation in a post-apocalyptic world in On the Beach (1959), Douglas Trumbull's vision of eco-disaster in Silent Running (1972), Michael Crichton's Westworld (1973) with androids malfunctioning, Soylent Green (1973) with its famous quote: "Soylent Green IS PEOPLE!", 'perfect' suburbanite wives in The Stepford Wives (1975), and the popular gladiatorial sport of the year 2018 in Rollerball (1975)). Commonly, sci-fi films express society's anxiety about technology and how to forecast and control the impact of technological and environmental change on contemporary society.

Science fiction often expresses the potential of technology to destroy humankind through Armaggedon-like events, wars between worlds, Earth-imperiling encounters or disasters (i.e., The Day The Earth Stood Still (1951), When Worlds Collide (1951), The War of the Worlds (1953), the two Hollywood blockbusters Deep Impact (1998) and Armageddon (1998), and The Day After Tomorrow (2004), etc.). In many science-fiction tales, aliens, creatures, or beings (sometimes from our deep subconscious, sometimes in space or in other dimensions) are unearthed and take the mythical fight to new metaphoric dimensions or planes, depicting an eternal struggle or battle (good vs. evil) that is played out by recognizable archetypes and warriors (i.e., Forbidden Planet (1956) with references to the 'id monster' from Shakespeare's The Tempest, the space opera Star Wars (1977) with knights and a princess with her galaxy's kingdom to save, The Fifth Element (1997), and the metaphysical Solaris (1972 and 2002)). Beginning in the 80s, science fiction began to be feverishly populated by noirish, cyberpunk films, with characters including cyber-warriors, hackers, virtual reality dreamers and druggies, and underworld low-lifers in nightmarish, un-real worlds (i.e., Blade Runner (1982), Strange Days (1995), Johnny Mnemonic (1995), and The Matrix (1999)).

Borrowing and Hybrid Genre Blending in Sci-Fi Films:
The genre is predominantly a version of fantasy films ( Star Wars (1977)), but can easily overlap with horror films, particularly when technology or alien life forms become malevolent (Alien (1979)) in a confined spaceship (much like a haunted-house story). Quite a few science-fiction films took an Earth-bound tale and transported it to outer space: High Noon (1952) became Outland (1980), The Magnificent Seven (1960) was spoofed in Battle Beyond the Stars (1980), Enemy Mine (1985) was essentially a remake of Hell in the Pacific (1968) with Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune, and the chariot race of Ben-Hur (1959) was duplicated in the pod-race of Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999).

Read more @ filmsite.org

Monday, 12 February 2018

Alien (1979) - Film Analysis

“Alien” was released in May of 1979 by 20th Century Fox with the tagline, “In space, no one can hear you scream.” The film was directed by Ridley Scott, produced by Gordon Carroll, David Giler, and Walter Hill and written by Dan O’Bannon, who also developed the film’s screenplay. This science fiction horror film regards an alien creature that stalks and kills crew members on the spaceship Nostromo after being brought aboard. Sigourney Weaver plays as Ripley, a warrant officer and is also the protagonist of the film. The film also features an all star cast that includes, Bolaji Badejo as the alien, Veronica Cartwright as Lambert, Ian Holm as Ash, John Hurt as Kane, Yaphet Kotto as Parker, Tom Skerritt as Dallas, and Harry Dean Stanton as Brett. In charge of the Academy Award winning visual effects was cinematographer Derek Vanlint, while the eerie film soundtrack was created Jerry Goldsmith. The film was a breakthrough for the science fiction genre as well as the horror genre and received both critical acclaim and commercial box office success bringing in a gross $104,931,801 with a budget of $11 million.

“Alien” came to the American screen in a time of immense cultural upheaval. The economy in the 1970s experienced periods of inflation, recession, and high unemployment. The economic conditions led to price controls and new and enhanced programs to combat poverty and unemployment. The decade was also marked by a growing importance of women in the workforce, as well as a second wave of feminist views. Sexual freedom and experimentation in the 1960s contributed to an uprising of sexually transmitted diseases in the 1970s, and a realization that these could affect the majority of the population. Exponential change in technology was also a major issue in the 70s. Many of these cultural changes attributed to both the horror and financial success of “Alien” because of the film’s prevalent consistency within the mind of 1970s America.

In October 1973, the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries proclaimed an oil embargo “In response to the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli military" until March 1974. In 1979 America experienced its second oil crisis because of disrupted productions and Iranian revolution. Throughout this time Americans felt a dread of continuous oil price increases and a worry that eventually there would be no more oil or gasoline. “Alien” plays on this fear immediately when it mentions that the crew’s main missions was mining mineral ore from distant places in the galaxy and return them to earth. They were on a mission to seek new forms of energy from other places than the Middle East, and it confirms fears that eventually the US would have to look elsewhere for its energy resources.

“Alien” was released in May of 1979, a short time after the partial nuclear meltdown at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania. Though the movie was already finished by the time of the accident, it had an effect on the way the movie was viewed. Technology getting out of control is a theme presented in Alien. Ash, the Science Officer of the Nostromo is an android. The rest of the crew, however, is not aware of this. Ash, and Mother, the ship’s onboard computer have been collaborating from the beginning to capture the alien creature. The lives of the crew are of minor significance to them. Ash goes so far as to attack Ripley, losing all normal functions in a “meltdown” that he experiences. People could identify with their lives being put in danger by machines that they could not control.

Another cultural context relevant to “Alien” is that of sexually transmitted diseases. Herpes, gonorrhea, and Chlamydia had become widespread in America, affecting nearly forty percent of sexually active individuals. For the first time, Americans had become frightened of the risk of disease in fornication. The Alien creature, being the villain archetype, is born through penetration of a host, Executive Officer Kane. Ripley makes an extensive point to follow quarantine procedure for fear of infection. This “infection” spread as the Alien grew rapidly and killed the rest of the crew. Audiences would relate to the need for quarantine and sterilization, noting how this sexually transmitted parasite goes on to destroy the crew it resides with.

But the strongest cultural context present within “Alien” is its embodiment of Feminism. The role of women in society was going through a turning point in the 1970s. Women’s organizations fought for an amendment to the United States Constitution known as the Equal Rights Amendment that would explicitly state that men and women were equal under the law. In 1974, The Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibited discrimination in consumer credit practices on the basis of sex, race, marital status, religion, national origin, or age. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act banned employment discrimination against pregnant women, stating a woman cannot be fired or denied a job or a promotion because she is or may become pregnant, nor can she be forced to take a pregnancy leave if she is willing and able to work. 1978 saw the largest march for equality in the history of the Feminist movement, the Equal Rights Amendment Extension March, which had over one-hundred thousand people in it. The 70s therefore saw a strong empowerment of woman within a predominantly patriarchal.

“Alien” shows us a clear instance of gender-role reversal in the heroine archetype. The story begins with a clear hierarchy of male dominants. As the film progresses however, the men are killed or fall under chain of command to women. Both the ship’s Captain and Executive Officer are used for the Alien’s reproduction, giving them a “mother” aspect. Ash even refers to the creature as “Kane’s son” referencing him as a mother. Ripley is then given the role of slaying the “monster” of the film, which was a presumed male role, dating back to medieval times. Making the main character of “Alien” a woman was a risky move by the film makers, and it ultimately proved successful. Had the film been released a few years earlier, audiences might not have accepted such a tough female protagonist, or it would have overwhelmed the rest of the film.

“Alien” is a science fiction horror film. Horror films are unsettling movies that strive to elicit the emotions of fear, disgust, panic, alarm, and shock from viewers through the means of the macabre and supernatural. Science Fiction Film is a film genre that uses speculative, science-based depictions of phenomena that are not necessarily accepted by mainstream science, such as extra-terrestrial life forms, alien worlds, and time travel, often along with futuristic elements such as spacecraft, robots, or other technologies. Since “Alien” primarily frightened the audience and evoked “eerie dread” it is categorized first as a horror film, but falls into the science fiction sub genre because it is set in the future and takes place aboard a space ship.

In a science fiction horror film, the threats usually come from the unknown, but can also include films in which the threat comes from technology. In “Alien”, the danger comes from an extraterrestrial creature that is feared both for its dangerous abilities, and its unpredictable hostility. Fear of uncontrollable technology is also present, in how Ash and Mother plot to preserve the Alien without the knowledge of the crew. The expectations and characteristics of science fiction horror were changed drastically after the release of “Alien” in 1979. Prior to this, most science fiction horror films were low budget B movies, mostly in the 1950s. They played on fear of the “other”, a threat from outside. While the threats in these films often came from outer space, they often played on America’s fear of communism and the Cold War. Some examples of this type of film include “The Thing from Another World”, “Invasion of the Body Snatchers”, and “It Came from Outer Space”

“Alien” introduced a new kind of science fiction horror. The threat still comes from the unknown, but the environment and method of attack were different. “Alien” borrowed elements from other types of horror film, like the slasher subgenre introduced by “Psycho” in 1960. Instead of a creepy old mansion where the characters were stalked by a serial killer, there could be a claustrophobic space ship where the characters were hunted by an alien creature. “Alien” uses the reveal of the tail, its shadow, or the head of the alien the same way a slasher film might reveal the killer’s knife while the victim is looking the other way. In the famous “shower scene” from “Psycho” the female victim’s face is turned away from the killer while he creeps up behind her. Likewise, when Ripley and Dallas are in the ICU looking for the infant alien creature, the tail of the alien lowered down behind Ripley, eventually startling her. “Alien” uses a formula common to many slasher films in that a group of people are killed one by one until the lead character, usually female, kills the antagonist. The difference is that science fiction is a genre of film that was usually dominated by male characters and male fans. By making the lead character Ripley female, the film makers expanded their potential audience and successfully combined horror and science fiction, paving the way for more female action stars in science fiction.

“Alien” quickly became a hit with both horror and science fiction audiences. It was the third highest grossing film in 1979 worldwide. “Alien” lead to five sequels, and continues to be a popular and successful franchise today. “Alien” followed on the success of “Star Wars” in 1977. Twentieth Century Fox saw the audience that science fiction could draw, and capitalized on that audience. “Alien” was intended to be for an older crowd, but would still aim to draw science fiction fans. “Jaws” was another movie that showed mainstream audiences were interested in horror outside of the standard slasher films. One reason that “Alien” was successful is because it is a movie set in a fictional universe, yet it remains identifiable with audiences today. The characters are easily identifiable because they are presented as regular blue collar workers, just in a different setting and time. They react how we would react in most cases. No year is given to explain how far in the future this is, which makes it seem less removed from our time. The technology presented in the movie appears very primitive. This allows the audience to understand what is happening without having to explain how the technology works or what it does.

The scene that “Alien” is more remembered for then any other is the scene when the alien bursts out of Kane’s chest, killing him in the process. This scene is very memorable for a number of reasons, primarily because of its level of gore, and disgusting nature. Kane does an excellent job portraying the pain of what it would feel like to be eaten alive from the inside. The sound effects also do a good job in making the audience imagine what is going on inside Kane’s body. Audiences had never seen anything quite like that before this movie. Part of the reason that the chest bursting scene is so memorable is that it’s symbolic to our fear of abjection. Abjection deals with the boundary between us and everything else. According to the French psychoanalyst Julia Kristeva, since the abject is situated outside the symbolic order, being forced to face it is an inherently traumatic experience. This act is done in the light of the parts of ourselves that we exclude: that is, the mother. We must abject the maternal, the object which has created us, in order to construct an identity. There is no greater way of showing abjection on film then having a creature eat a person from inside out and emerge. Because of this, this scene has survived to be one of the most shocking and horrific in the history of horror.

Director Ridley Scott chose not to show the Alien creature in full through most of the film, showing only pieces of it while keeping most of its body in shadow in order to heighten the sense of terror and suspense. The audience could thus project their own fears into imagining what the rest of the creature might look like. This technique was highly successful and continues to be seen repeatedly in Modern American Horror films to this day.

“Alien” uses various elements of film noir along with other elements of German Expressionism and traditional Silent Horror. The planet where the Alien resides, most of the ship, and even the escape pod is shot using low key lighting. This is to symbolize the Alien’s presence in that area, or symbolically, the presence of evil. Well lit areas such as the stasis room, mother’s central control room, and the kitchen corresponded with the sanctity or safety of the area. When Dallas and Ash first attempted to remove the Alien from Kane’s face in the ICU, the room was well lit and signified no danger, yet when they returned to find the Alien missing in the room, it was dark and ominous. Scott used an abundance of close-up angle shots of the various characters and the Alien to show their fear and hide the Alien’s true form from the audience.

The Mise-en-scene of “Alien” is beautifully portrayed when Ripley is attempting to escape the ship. Pressured air is escaping from every leaky gasket, water dripping from the pipes, emergency lights flashing red throughout each corridor, and sewer-like flooring gives the entire environment a hellish feeling. The colors used reflect a variety of black and white shades as in Film Noir, but include neon greens, bright lucid reds to give it a surreal space look. Another interesting motif in the film is the reoccurring feel of wetness. Water drips from each corridor near the engineering rooms, viscous liquid drips from the Alien’s body and mouth, and sweat runs down from the crew’s faces (mostly Ripley). The heat, gas, and wetness give the ship a living breathing aspect, with more of an environmental feel than a cold mechanical look. The environment is like a jungle, when chains hanging like vines, hidden caves, and running water, with the Alien acting as a carnivore hunting its prey.

The final quality of the film that gives it its edge and horror is its soundtrack. The sound is quiet and surreal, with an underlying eeriness about it. There are various sounds of wind howling, screeching sounds, and monotonous circling of violin and electronics. It’s amazing and ironic to see a soundtrack make such an impact, when the sounds are low key and faint, barely audible except in certain turning points of the film. The opening scene presents this rather well. While small lines appear before a black screen revealing the title, we see it fade into space, while a subtle, low key flute plays in the background with howling sounds. It completely counters the main title sequence feel of “Star Wars” with its trumpets of extravagance. This subtle low-key soundtrack gives it a true space feel, and resorts back to its “In space no one can hear you scream” motto.

“Alien” continues to frighten audiences throughout for its subjectivity into the unknown and darkness of space. We are forced to look inward into our own dark voids and become utterly helpless and vulnerable to the Alien’s uncanny power. “Alien” reflected the fears and uncertainty of 1970s America, while perfectly referencing previous work in the genre. A monster film, a slasher film, a science fiction film, a horror film, “Alien” remains timeless in our eyes for its innovation and style, both ideal in presenting us with a story of horror in the dangers of discovery, and will continue to haunt the dreams of audiences for decades to come.

Saturday, 15 June 2013

'Elysium' (2013)


'Elysium' is director Neill Blomkamp's follow up to his relatively low-budget debut feature 'District 9' – produced by Peter Jackson. What he has done with a $90 million budget is pretty breathtaking.


Set in a dystopian future where the rich live on an idyllic space habitat while the rest of the population slug it out on a dying, overpopulated Earth stricken with poverty and disease, 'Elysium' looks like it could be genre defining.

Damon plays Max De Costa, a man diagnosed with terminal cancer, whose only hope is undergoing a radical - and mechanical - surgical procedure to help him break into the metropolis above.

Pitted against Jodie Foster's Secretary Delacourt, who oversees the utopian world in the stars, De Costa carries the fate of those living on Earth in his hands.

It appears that Blomkamp has hit a balance between political comment and eye-popping action with only his second film, so this could make him a serious Hollywood player in years to come. Also starring 'District 9's Sharlto Copley, William Fichtner, Wagner Moura, Alice Braga and Diego Luna, 'Elysium' is due for release on August 23.


Saturday, 22 December 2012

'Safety Not Guaranteed' (2012): Released Boxing Day


Safety Not Guaranteed is a 2012 American comedy-drama film inspired by a 1997 Backwoods Home Magazineclassified ad – written as a joke filler by Backwoods employee John Silveira – by a person asking for someone to accompany him in time travel. It was screened at the 2012 Sundance Film Festival where it won the Waldo Salt Screenwriting Award.

Budget = $750,000
Box office = $4,001,58 (US - Released 8/6/12)


Safety Not Guaranteed received critical acclaim with a 94% approval from 109 critics on Rotten Tomatoes—an average score of 7.6 out of 10—where the consensus reads: "Safety Not Guaranteed's ostensibly modest ambitions are outmatched by the movie's strong performances, beguiling charm, and heartfelt story." Stephen Holden of The New York Times wrote that the story's shenanigans are "harnessed to a plaintive underlying theme about the fading dreams of those aspiring professionals in their 20s and 30s."

Wednesday, 31 October 2012

The Gift: Sci-Fi short


A mysterious box sparks mayhem among men and robots in The Gift, a short film directed by Carl Erik Rinsch. The film was made for Philips Cinema's Parallel Lines film series, but it transcends the limitations of branded content and short fiction in general -- not to mention the usual sci-fi clichés. 


Tuesday, 2 October 2012

Looper's £2.4m opening fires some life into a feeble UK box office


The winner

Just when it looked as if September was going to go by without a single film opening above £2m, Looper arrives to kick some much-needed life into a sickly UK box office. Its three-day gross of £2.43m is hardly record-shattering, but following a run of films opening around or under £1m – Killing Them Softly, The Sweeney, Dredd, Lawless, Anna Karenina – it is welcome news for the nation's cinema chains. It's also a new benchmark for Joseph Gordon-Levitt in a lead role. Premium Rushrecently debuted with a disappointing £115,000 from 159 cinemas. Last November, 50/50, co-starring Seth Rogen, kicked off with £410,000 from 228 venues. In 2009, (500) Days of Summer began its run with £1.24m, including £383,000 in previews. Debuts of films such as Inception andThe Dark Knight Rises, where Gordon-Levitt is not the lead actor, are, of course, much higher. Bruce Willis and Emily Blunt contributed additional marketable elements to Looper, although it's likely that the genre, high concept and reputation of the film played the biggest roles in stimulating audience interest.

Looper has achieved the biggest opening for a live-action film based on original characters since Ted in early August, and is one of few pictures not based on existing material to debut above £2m this year; the others being The Iron Lady, The Dictator and Safe House. You can add Chronicle and Magic Mike to that list if those films' preview takings are included in their opening-weekend tallies. The Iron Lady had the advantage of pre-existing awareness of its subject, although the screenplay qualifies as original.

Director Rian Johnson has previously enjoyed a notably patchy record at the UK box office. His last film, The Brothers Bloom, debuted with a weak £36,500 from 23 screens. Before that, Brick did a lot better, beginning its run with £143,000 from 43 cinemas.

The chasing pack

Dipping just 12%, stop-motion animation ParaNorman posts a third straight weekend at £1m-plus. Titles this year that failed to achieve such a feat include The Bourne Legacy, Battleship and Dark Shadows. With £4.3m so far, ParaNorman is more or less matching the success of Universal/Laika predecessor Coraline, which stood at £4.97m after three weekends, but benefited from more than £1m in previews.

Landing in third place with £792,000, Resident Evil: Retributionrepresents a significant setback for the franchise, which had seen debut grosses steadily rise. Second film Apocalypse began its run with £801,000 in 2004, increasing to £932,000 in 2007 for the opening weekend of Extinction, and then an impressive £1.69m just over two years ago for the start of fourth film Afterlife – the first to be presented in 3D. The original Resident Evil debuted in 2002 with £802,000, meaning that newly arrived Retribution has proved to be the weakest opener of any in the series. It's fair to conclude that the cachet of 3D has significantly diminished for this kind of fare during the past two years.

In fourth place, Will Ferrell/Zach Galifianakis comedy The Campaign, with £771,000, isn't a terrible result for a film with a US-politics theme. Top comedy openers for the year so far are Ted (£9.33m), America Pie: Reunion (£6.33m) and The Dictator (£4.96m). (All those figures include preview takings.)

The arthouse battle
While crossover titles including Killing Them Softly, Hope Springs, Anna Karenina and Lawless continue to snag upscale viewers, middlebrow French-language crowd-pleaser Untouchable expands significantly to 154 screens, just sneaking into the top 10 with £493,000. For a genuine arthouse release, you have to go all the way down to 21st place to findHoly Motors, debuting on £66,000 from 23 screens, including £17,000 in previews. The film could not have asked for more glowing reviews, but less-adventurous audiences may have decided that "a gorgeous furry teacup of a film, preposterous and filled with secrets," as the Guardian's Peter Bradshaw had it, was not for them. The result is significantly up on director Leos Carax's last film, Pola X, which debuted with £5,900 from three screens, on its way to a lifetime tally of £29,200.
Also released at the weekend, but with considerably less fanfare, wasBarbara, from German helmer Christian Petzold. With £25,300 from 12 screens, including a sweet £8,851 at London's Renoir cinema, the film is already more than halfway to the lifetime total of Petzold's previous UK theatrical release, 2007's Yella (£44,000).
Playing exclusively in Cineworld sites, Polish-language film You Are God, recounting the true tale of late-90s hip-hop band Paktofonika, did better than both Holy Motors and Barbara, with £73,000 from 25 cinemas, and a 10-day total of £215,000. Previous films primarily targeting the UK's Polish population have seen massive plunges from the opening weekend, whereas You Are God dipped just 25%, on a modestly expanded screen count. Either the film is now reaching beyond the core Polish market – a stated aim for local distributor Project London – or audience patterns in this market sector are evolving.

The future

Following five successive weekends when the market was down compared with a year ago, the addition of Looper has helped the current frame post a 39% improvement on the 2011 equivalent, when Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy held on at the chart summit for a third week, and Taylor Lautner vehicle Abduction was the top new release. Cinema bookers will be looking for a further boost this weekend, with the arrival of Liam Neeson in Taken 2, Ethan Hawke horror flick Sinister, and well-regarded teen title The Perks of Being a Wallflower, based on Stephen Chbosky's bestseller. Also thrown into the mix are girl-group remake Sparkle, featuring Whitney Houston's final performance, and comedy The Knot, the third feature this year featuring and co-written by prolific multi-hyphenate Noel Clarke. Arthouses will welcome Liberal Arts, starring Josh Radnor and Elizabeth Olsen, while English Vinglish is the latest aimed at the nation's reliably robust Bollywood audience.

Top 10 films

1. Looper, £2,427,994 from 449 sites (New)
2. ParaNorman, £1,080,197 from 495 sites. Total: £4,304,900
3. Resident Evil: Retribution, £792,265 from 349 sites (New)
4. The Campaign, £772,102 from 390 sites (New)
5. House at the End of Street, £545,961 from 369 sites. Total: £1,864,304
6. Killing them Softly, £470,712 from 372 sites. Total: £2,069,984
7. Hope Springs, £423,051 from 381 sites. Total: £3,041,790
8. The Sweeney, £410,578 from 342 sites. Total: £3,876,142
9. Brave, £400,511 from 466 sites. Total: £21,219,445
10. Untouchable, £317,979 from 153 sites. Total: £493,309

Thursday, 6 September 2012

'Loom': Sci-fi short film from Luke Scott


He is an acclaimed commercial director who has pushed through his work to step out of the shadow of his father, Ridley Scott.  And now Luke Scott is transcending boundaries in video technology with a visually-arresting 20-minute short film, 'Loom'.

Shot in coordination with RED Camera, the sci-fi short features Giovanni Ribisi and Jellybean Howie, although cinematographer Dariusz Wolski just might be its star.

A film shot completely in 4K format in the tone and style of Ridley Scott's dystopian 'Blade Runner'. The film was originally intended to help showcase the prototype REDray 3D laser player. The film was constructed for 3D, the film needed to push the limits of the cameras exposure sensitivity and colour range and 4K projection. Visually the film is unmatched to date in it's use of RED's new technology.

Friday, 25 May 2012

Iron Sky: Kermode Uncut


Iron Sky is a dark science fiction comedy directed by Timo Vuorensola and will feature musical score composed by Laibach. The film is produced by Blind Spot Pictures and Energia Productions in Finland, and co-produced by 27 Films in Germany and New Holland Pictures in Australia. Principal photography took place in Germany in November-December 2010 and in Australia in January-February 2011.

Iron Sky premieres at the Berlin International Film Festival in February and opens in theaters in April 2012 with Finland opening on 4th of April and Germany on the 5th of April.

Saturday, 5 May 2012

Prometheus trailer: a spoiler, or sneaky marketing?


Is a revelation in a TV trailer for Ridley Scott's new science-fiction film just a calculated attempt to increase hype?

Ever since the first film blogger put fingertips to typewriter (and probably long before then), eagle-eyed cineastes have been trying to work out the plot of this or that new movie before it has even arrived on the big screen. For film marketing teams, it's a surefire way of gaining free exposure for your product: sow enough seeds, and "seed" enough exclusive unlockable content, and you'll soon be able to sit back and watch the movie promote itself via social networks and film forums.

A key part of such a dynamic is, of course, the trailer, along with its cousin the TV spot and its newer, internet-era offspring, the trailer-for-trailer and the movie clip. We should also mention the "viral videos" featuring footage not seen in the film itself, which fill out the backstory and generate further interest among fans.

Prometheus, the uber-hyped new science-fiction film from Ridley Scott, "set in the universe of Alien", has had all the above in spades. I wrote in a post earlier this week that the movie and its marketing campaign were in serious danger of eating themselves, so many spoilers and potential spoilers were being revealed in promo footage. Well, it now seems that the ever-increasing demand for more information from fans – and the ever-expanding determination of marketing teams to give it to them – may just have given birth to a Prometheus spoiler of epic proportions.

Prometheus fan's have been alerted to the outrage forming on the forum of the film's official website. Someone with good eyesight has taken it upon themselves to scour one of the latest TV spots for the movie, and has apparently discovered a shot in which android David, played by a bequiffed blond Michael Fassbender, appears to have been decapitated.

There are wider issues here, of course. First of all, is this a mistake by Scott and his team, an error which would never have been exposed in the pre-internet era and which fans have a right to be pretty angry about? Or even worse, was it a deliberate "seed" designed to catapult the film's already rampant hype into something truly stratospheric? Thirdly, there exists the possibility that some particularly nefarious troll has photoshopped David's head into a genuine screenshot from the TV spot and posted it on the film's official forum just to annoy people. Oh, and for good measure, it's possible the head doesn't even belong to David: Scott has said there may be more than one android on board the Prometheus, and there are certainly at least two prominent blond(e) crew members.

There's something very irritating about the (alleged) possibility that marketing people are deliberating seeding spoilers here in order to boost interest.

The Android's Noggin Scandal, as it will almost certainly not come to be called in future years, comes on the same day as fanboy blogs revealed that the American release of Avengers Assemble (titled The Avengers anywhere sensible) has not one but two post-credit-scenes, designed to pique fans' interest and presumably irritate cleaners waiting to clear up popcorn and sticky sweets. I remember the days when you turned up to the cinema, having perhaps seen one or two trailers for the film, and duly sat down to enjoy the thing. In 2012 some of us probably know more about what we're about to see before the opening scene begins than many people used to by the end credits. But who is to blame: the rabidly avaricious internet-era filmgoer, or the cynical marketing type who gives away too much?

Edited from: guardian filmblog 3/5/12


Friday, 13 April 2012

Who Cut The Hunger Games?


A few weeks ago Mark Kermode stated that The Hunger Games had been cut to get a 12A certificate in the UK.

This started a debate about who was really responsible and whether it was censorship or marketing...